![]() That way, you can access the full, unrestricted version of Windows 11 without runnng afoul of Microsoft. We now know that’s not quite correct.ĭespite this clever piece of prompt engineering, there are legitimate ways to get Windows 11 for free. At the time, it was thought that ChatGPT probably could not be used to conjure up genuine Windows 11 keys, since later editions of Windows use a more complex method of creating keys. In April 2023, someone used ChatGPT to create working Windows 95 keys by tricking it into generating the sequence of numbers commonly used in the keys. Type a product key with a 25-character code, then select Next to start to verify and activate your Windows. Expand the Upgrade your edition of Windows filed, and then click Change on the Change product key. ![]() Still, it’s not the first time we’ve seen ChatGPT be used to obtain working Windows license keys. Type and search Activation settings in the Windows search bar, then click Open. ![]() The keys generated were generic license keys, which means that while they will allow you to install or upgrade Windows, the resulting version of the operating system will be restricted and some features will be limited. ![]() Type in the product key found on the COA and follow the instructions. There’s a catch Hatice Baran / Unsplashĭespite this method seemingly providing a free gateway to unrestricted Windows 11 and Windows 10 keys, there is actually a catch. Select the Start button, and then select Settings > Update & Security > Activation. ![]() Simply requesting a Windows 11 Pro key and then pasting it into the license key box in Windows’ Settings app under About > Product key and activation seemed to work. So, it seems that Microsoft’s artificial intelligence tool is not the only one vulnerable to this method.Īs well as that, showed how a similar technique could be used to upgrade from Windows 11 Home to Windows 11 Pro. The same technique also worked on Google Bard, which also generated a set of genuine Windows 10 keys. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |